Page 97 - ILL Annual Report 2019

EXPERIMENTAL AND USER PROGRAMME
94-95
College 9 20 %
College 8 13 %
College 4 9%
College 5A 10 %
College 7 8%
College 1 8 %
College 3 7 %
Figure 3
Proposals are divided amongst the various colleges. Figure 3 shows the distribution amongst the colleges of those that were accepted.
College 6 4 %
College 5B 21 %
Table 1
Distribution amongst the ILL member countries of beamtime requested and allocated in the November 2018 and April 2018 panel meetings. Accepted proposals were scheduled in 2019. Proposals from purely non-member countries do not appear in this table; therefore, the total requests and allocations are different in Table 2.
Request days
Request %
Allocated days
Allocated %
AT
211.66
3.06
83.55
2.65
BE
21.98
0.32
14.21
0.45
CH
391.02
5.65
122.94
3.89
CZ
83.92
1.21
43.34
1.37
DE
1 580.85
22.84
771.65
24.44
DK
201.32
2.91
76.59
2.43
ES
398.02
5.75
208.19
6.59
FR
1 876.41
27.11
833.03
26.38
GB
1 168.84
16.89
703.75
22.29
IT
406.46
5.87
80.93
2.56
PL
147.33
2.13
57.88
1.83
SE
419.18
6.06
152.18
4.82
SK
15.32
0.22
9.26
0.29
Total
6 922.31
100.00
3 157.5
100.00
In calculating the statistics for beamtime per country shown in Table 1, the attribution is based on the location of the laboratory of the proposers, not their personal nationality. For a proposal involving laboratories from more than
one member country, the total number of days is divided amongst the collaborating countries and weighted by
the number of people from each. Local contacts are
not counted as proposers. The beamtime requested by
and allocated to scientists from the ILL is allocated to the member countries according to a weighting system based on the fractional membership of the country of the institute concerned. When a proposal involves collaboration with a non-member country, the allocated time is attributed entirely to the collaborating member countries. Proposals in which all proposers are from non-member countries, therefore, do not appear in this table.
www.ill.eu