| |
Molecular dynamics (MD)
simulations on glass forming systems of very different nature, such as
Selenium, ortotherphenyl, water, or Lennard- Jones liquids have shown
a series of “universal features” for the non-Gaussian parameter
α2(t) corresponding to the self-motion of the atoms in
the α-relaxation regime. The observed behaviour appears to be intrinsically
related to the universal character of the α-relaxation. A combination
of MD-simulations and neutron scattering on polyisoprene, based on a feedback
procedure between the two techniques, has allowed us to establish that
the above mentioned “universal features“ of α2(t)
are also found in glass-forming polymers. We show that these features
are nicely captured by a simple anomalous jump diffusion model with a
distribution of jump lengths.
The freezing of the structural (a)
relaxation in a glass-forming system leads to the glass transition phenomenon
– still one of the most intriguing problems in condensed matter
physics. Therefore, the understanding of the molecular motions during
this relaxation is of utmost importance to shed some light on the glass
formation process. Neutron scattering (NS) and Molecular Dynamics (MD)
simulations are essential for this goal. For instance, during the last
years, extensive NS investigations of the incoherent scattering function
Fs(Q,t) have allowed a universal behaviour for the self-atomic
motions in the α-relaxation regime of glass forming systems, including
polymers, to be established. As figure 1 evidences, Fs(Q,t)
shows a stretched exponential or Kohlrausch-Williams-Watt (KWW) functional
form characterized by the exponent ß: Fs(Q,t) exp[-(t/τw)ß]
with a characteristic time t/τw(Q)
that clearly depends on Q (see e.g. [1,2]). This observation implies the
diffusive nature of the atomic motions in this regime.
Furthermore,
results on polymers accumulated over more than ten years [1,3] show that
in the low Q-regime (approx. 0.2 <= Q <= 1.5 Å-1)
the Q-dependence of τw can be described as: t/τw
Q-2/ß (see for example the inset of figure 1). Considering
this expression in Fs(Q,t), one immediately realizes its Gaussian
form. This implies that for this process the non-Gaussian parameter α2(t),
which measures deviations ~ Q4 in the exponent of Fs(Q,t),
has to be very close to zero.
A Gaussian Fs(Q,t) is
in apparent contradiction to results from MD-simulations on glass forming
systems other than polymers (Lennard-Jones liquids, water, ortho-terphenyl
and Selenium), from which clearly non negligible values for α2(t)
have been deduced. Even features of universal character have been found
for α2(t); the existence of a maximum that increases
with decreasing temperature and shifts according to the thermal behaviour
of the structural relaxation time. Since deviations from Gaussian behaviour
are usually understood as a signature of dynamical heterogeneities,
conclusions
in this direction have been drawn from such MD-simulations results. Thus
the question arises: do glass forming polymers behave in a different
way?
We note that a close look at the data in the inset of figure 1 suggests
deviations from the proposed Gaussian law τw(Q)
.
Q-2/ß in the high Q-range. At this point, in order
to reach some deeper understanding we decided to take a twofold approach:
we performed fully atomistic MD-simulations [4] and neutron scattering
measurements on the same polymer, polyisoprene (PI). The experiments
included
NSE (ILL and Jülich, see some results on figure 1) and IN13 measurements,
extending the investigated Q-range as much as possible, especially towards
high Q. Using a sample with deuterated methyl groups (PId3) the experimental
results mainly reflect the self motions of the main chain protons, that
can also be followed from the atomic trajectories delivered by the MD-simulations.
Figure
2 shows the Q-dependence of τw
obtained from the two approaches. First of all, we note an impressive
agreement between both kinds of results, validating the MD-simulations.
Moreover, the data unequivocally confirm the Gaussian-like behaviour
in the Qrange approx. Q <= 1 Å-1, while clear signatures
of deviations become evident at higher Q-values. Having validated our
MD-simulations, we can take advantage of them and compute magnitudes
that are not easily experimentally accessible, like α2(t)
and the mean squared displacement < r2(t)> of the main
chain protons. They are shown in figure 3(a), while figure 3(b) displays
the calculated Fs(Q,t) for several Q-values. As reported for
the other glass-forming systems, a main maximum is indeed found for α2(t)
at t* 4
ps, just in the early stages of the decaging process identified with
the
a-relaxation. The shadowed area in figure 3 shows the region where α2(t)
takes significant values. We can immediately see that for low Q-values
this area only covers the initial part of the slow decay (a-regime) of
Fs(Q,t). However, as Q increases, the marked time range starts
to cover almost completely the slow decay. This naturally explains
the
finding of the deviations from Gaussian behaviour of Fs(Q,t).
at high Q-values. What could be the origin of such deviations? The way
the characteristic time departs from the Gaussian expectation (figure
2) strongly
reminds us of the very well known manifestations of the discrete nature
of diffusion in simple jump diffusion models. Based on this similarity,
we have proposed a model that considers a distribution of elementary
jump lengths underlying the anomalous diffusion undergone by the atoms
in the
a-process [5,6]. As can be appreciated in figure 2, such an extremely
simple approach allows a very accurate description of the Q-dependence
of τw
in the whole Q-range investigated. The associated distribution of jump
lengths
(inset of figure 2) has a maximum at about 0.4 Å. We emphasize
that this model also semiquantitatively reproduces the behaviour of α2(t)
[see figure 3(a)], within its range of validity (above 1 ps approximately)
[5,6]. It is finally noteworthy that the main “universal features”
reported in the literature for α2(t) are also naturally
deduced in this approach [5,6]. This suggests that the essence of the
universal deviations from Gaussian behaviour in the self-motions of atoms
during the structural relaxation regime lies in the distribution of
discrete
steplengths underlying the anomalous diffusion. Initial analysis of the
MD trajectories confirms this model of diffusion and detailed analysis
is underway.
|
|
References:
[1] J. Colmenero, A. Alegría, A. Arbe and B. Frick, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 69 (1992) 478
[2] J. Wuttke, I. Chang, O.G. Randl, F. Fujara and W. Petry, Phys.
Rev. E 54 (1996) 5364
[3] A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, M. Monkenbusch and D. Richter, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 81 (1998) 590
[4] J. Colmenero, F. Alvarez and A. Arbe, Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 041804
[5] A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, F. Alvarez, M. Monkenbusch, D. Richter,
B. Farago and B. Frick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 245701
[6] A. Arbe, J. Colmenero, F. Alvarez, M. Monkenbusch, D. Richter,
B. Farago and B. Frick Phys. Rev. E 67 (2003) 51802 |
|