| |

|
S. Rowe (ILL)
|
|
Traditionally, standard translation
and rotation tables or goniometers have been used for sample positioning
in various configurations, in order to generate the required degrees
of freedom for the end-actuator. This serial system suffers from
two primary problems. Each unit is required to support not only
the load of the sample, but also the load of all the units above
it. Both absolute accuracy and repeatability errors generated by
each unit, are passed on in succession. Generally, these limitations
do not present a problem for standard powder diffraction experiments,
but may be crucial for residual stress analysis, where the highest
positioning precision of big samples is required. However, other
architectures do exist and the most interesting looks to be the
parallel closed-loop mechanism, more commonly known as a parallel
robot (figure 1 is an example).
|
|
Parallel mechanisms have several advantages. Depending on the exact
configuration the load can often be purely axial, and is always
distributed through the legs. The structures have a high degree
of inherent rigidity, and as any errors generated in the legs are
averaged, these mechanisms tend to be more accurate. Furthermore,
the speed of displacement is often greater as the motors are generally
positioned on the fixed base. On the other hand, calculation of
the available workspace can be difficult and generally results in
quite a complex shaped volume (figure 2). 
|
|
Within
this workspace forbidden areas can exist, known as singularities.
These are particular positions where the end actuator will either
lose its rigidity entirely and hence fall over, or the forces in
the legs will increase to infinity and result in breaking part of
the robot or locking up. Finally, due to the complex mathematical
relationship between the leg length and the position of the end
effect, control has been a problem in the past. Modern computer
systems have eliminated this disadvantage.
|

Figure 1: Stewart platform with a repeatability in X, Y and Z better
than 5μm, and a load capacity of 20 kN. (Courtesy of European Molecular
Biology Laboratories, Hamburg) |
|

Figure 2: Stewart platform showing two possible work volumes,
within the complex and total volume available. (Courtesy of
William Hutt, Manchester University-ILL). |
|
|
Historically, the design and manufacture of parallel robots have
remained within the domain of academia or high-tech companies, who
have had a need for a solution to unique problems, such as aircraft
simulation. However, as a result of lower cost and high-speed computing
availability (easing the control of such mechanisms), industry has
started to make in-roads into areas traditionally restricted to
standard mechanism configurations, such as high- precision placement
required for silicon chip manufacture. This higher volume market
means that a number of systems are now commercially available.
It is the variable actuator length Stewart platforms (also known
as Hexapods or Gough platform after the original designer) that
have had the highest degree of exposure. They now represent the
top end of the market both in degrees of freedom (offering 6) and
in terms of cost. They are marketed by such companies as Physik
Instrumente [1] offering the M-850, Micos [2] building the PAROS
(figure 3) and others, who offer machines capable of positioning
loads in excess of 50 kg to a resolution better than 2μm and
5μrad.
Figure 3: Stewart platform showing tilt of
the top plate.
|
|
|
|
The majority of requirements will often not need the full six degrees
of freedom offered by the above machines, and unfortunately it is
this market that is currently under-developed. The large number
of possible combinations of degrees of freedom has meant that unless
a specific application exists, little has actually been constructed
beyond theoretical models, although a number of interesting smaller
units are available from such companies as New Focus [3].
What is the ILL's position regarding parallel robots? The ILL
is constructing a neutron Strain Imager as part of the Millennium
Programme and in collaboration with the University of Manchester
(partly funded by an EPSRC grant). Its sample positioning system
will consist of a full six degrees of freedom Stewart platform,
capable of positioning loads up to 500 kg to better than 50μm.
The initial configuration was designed jointly by the ILL and INRIA
Sophia-Antipolis. This is now in the process of being turned into
a detailed 3D model by OHE [4] (see figure 4). 
|
|
The
basic features will be six hydraulically driven actuators, each
with a stroke of 470 mm and a working pressure of up to 160 bar.
A linear transducer with a resolution of 0.1 μm will be positioned
within each cylinder and used to determine the leg length. Control
will be via a controller-board with a 500 MHz CPU with a cycle-time
of 4 kHz. These actuators will be fixed to the top and bottom plates
using universal joints. The speed of operation and workspace will
be restricted, with two or three possible configurations within
the total volume available. These will hopefully be singularity
free, although until the final configuration is realised it is not
possible to calculate whether this will be the case. If not, then
position restrictions will be incorporated into the driver software.
What is the future? There is no danger of the disappearance of traditional
serial robots - their simplicity of control and use will always
safeguard their place in the market. But certainly the Strain Imager
Stewart platform represents a leading edge technology with regard
to load capacity and positioning precision. In general, the advantages
provided by parallel type architectures will ensure an increase
in their use.
|

Figure 4: CAD 3D image of the proposed Stewart platform being developed
for the ILL. (Courtesy of OHE) |
|

Figure 5: Stewart platform. (Courtesy of Micos) |
|
|
REFERENCES
[1] Physik Instrumente (PI) GmbH & Co, D-76337 Waldbronn, Germany
[2] Micos, D-79224 Umkirch, Germany
[3] New Focus, San Jose CA 95138, USA
[4] OHE, Ebikon, CH-6030 Switzerland
|
|